It's easy to dismiss someone like Trump or Musk with superficial arguments about hotels or futuristic projects, but let's look at the bigger picture. Both have challenged the status quo in significant ways—whether you agree with them or not. Trump disrupted a political system that had been growing stagnant and out of touch with everyday people, and Musk has pushed technological boundaries that many thought were impossible. You might not like their personalities, but dismissing their contributions without acknowledging the broader impact of their work feels shortsighted. As for free speech, it's about giving everyone a voice, even those we disagree with. Silencing certain perspectives only leads to more control by those who claim to be "protecting" the free world. Shouldn't we be wary of any side that seeks to limit discourse instead of encouraging open debate?
If I were to give you the money, there’s a good chance you might spend it all within a few months. This often happens when people win the lottery; statistically, many struggle to manage their sudden wealth. What’s truly valuable is having the ability to make money, because those who understand how to generate wealth are also better equipped to use and manage it wisely. It's not just about having money, but knowing how to sustain and grow it for long-term success...
Honestly, I don't agree. I agree I would probably spend it. But it could be invested. Only banks 'make' money, literally. To earn money you make your capital work.
So, you are the only voice we idiots need to believe in this Free Speech statement. I could not think of anything more damaging to the world than a Trump/Musk coalition. How many hotels and golf courses do you need. How much of your money will Musk spend on futuristic projects. None of these two have you or the rest of us in the FREE world in mind.
This seems like a collection of sweeping statements (e.g. Biden and Kamala are incompetent) with very little thoughtful argumentation, even though the latter is what you appear to be arguing for.
The intention wasn’t to dive into a detailed political analysis, but rather to highlight that when there’s bias, propaganda, and media manipulation, it’s a clear sign something is wrong. Right now, this is happening on a large scale. It’s a battle between globalists and the status quo, with everyday people challenging the establishment—and they aren’t afraid to admit it. Even the Trump/Harris debate yesterday demonstrated just how one-sided and unfair things have become.
In the past, no matter which party you voted for, the outcome was more or less the same - this is how Europe is at the moment. But now, in the US, things look completely different. The massive wave of propaganda and bias against one party is unprecedented in normal peaceful times—at least not to my knowledge.
Absolute rubbish. The platform you are using is unashamedly Right Wing biased and has no intention of being fair and equal to all contributors. With Musk spouting anti leftist propaganda daily. As owner of this carrier of Free Speech he should neutral and allow Free Speech to take its course. Instead he is manipulating the Right to such a degree that I would describe him as dangerous, bordering on media terrorism.
It's ironic that you accuse Musk of media manipulation when it’s actually the left that has mastered the art of controlling narratives through mainstream media, academia, and tech giants. The left claims to stand for free speech, but in reality, they’ve been silencing dissenting voices through censorship, cancel culture, and biased media coverage for years.
What’s truly dangerous is the way leftist ideology has been pushed so aggressively, with those who question it labelled as extremists or "terrorists." The true manipulation is coming from those who seek to control what we think, say, and believe—all while pretending to champion equality and fairness.
The right, on the other hand, is finally pushing back against this Orwellian control, demanding real free speech and transparency.
Those questioned are extremely dangerous. When one man can buy a platform for the sole purpose of controlling the minds of innocent people and manipulating that platform to be biased to one side which he is hoping might win so that he can move into a position of political and economic power so as to manipulate the economic markets is far from the Freedom of Speech he professes to encourage.
It seems you're attributing far too much power to one individual, as if Musk's acquisition of a platform is the sole factor shaping minds. The truth is, free speech inherently means allowing all viewpoints, even those we may disagree with. If the left dominates mainstream media, academia, and social platforms, should it not be balanced out by voices like Musk’s? What’s actually concerning is when dissenting views are silenced under the guise of “protecting” people, which happens far more on left-leaning platforms.
Musk isn’t manipulating people into one ideology—he’s simply opening the door for a more diverse range of opinions to be expressed, which is the very essence of free speech. The idea that one man’s actions could solely sway political and economic markets seems like an exaggeration. If anything, what we need is more open dialogue and less gatekeeping of ideas from either side.
It's easy to dismiss someone like Trump or Musk with superficial arguments about hotels or futuristic projects, but let's look at the bigger picture. Both have challenged the status quo in significant ways—whether you agree with them or not. Trump disrupted a political system that had been growing stagnant and out of touch with everyday people, and Musk has pushed technological boundaries that many thought were impossible. You might not like their personalities, but dismissing their contributions without acknowledging the broader impact of their work feels shortsighted. As for free speech, it's about giving everyone a voice, even those we disagree with. Silencing certain perspectives only leads to more control by those who claim to be "protecting" the free world. Shouldn't we be wary of any side that seeks to limit discourse instead of encouraging open debate?
Give me the money 💰 I volunteer…
If I were to give you the money, there’s a good chance you might spend it all within a few months. This often happens when people win the lottery; statistically, many struggle to manage their sudden wealth. What’s truly valuable is having the ability to make money, because those who understand how to generate wealth are also better equipped to use and manage it wisely. It's not just about having money, but knowing how to sustain and grow it for long-term success...
Honestly, I don't agree. I agree I would probably spend it. But it could be invested. Only banks 'make' money, literally. To earn money you make your capital work.
So, you are the only voice we idiots need to believe in this Free Speech statement. I could not think of anything more damaging to the world than a Trump/Musk coalition. How many hotels and golf courses do you need. How much of your money will Musk spend on futuristic projects. None of these two have you or the rest of us in the FREE world in mind.
This seems like a collection of sweeping statements (e.g. Biden and Kamala are incompetent) with very little thoughtful argumentation, even though the latter is what you appear to be arguing for.
The intention wasn’t to dive into a detailed political analysis, but rather to highlight that when there’s bias, propaganda, and media manipulation, it’s a clear sign something is wrong. Right now, this is happening on a large scale. It’s a battle between globalists and the status quo, with everyday people challenging the establishment—and they aren’t afraid to admit it. Even the Trump/Harris debate yesterday demonstrated just how one-sided and unfair things have become.
In the past, no matter which party you voted for, the outcome was more or less the same - this is how Europe is at the moment. But now, in the US, things look completely different. The massive wave of propaganda and bias against one party is unprecedented in normal peaceful times—at least not to my knowledge.
Absolute rubbish. The platform you are using is unashamedly Right Wing biased and has no intention of being fair and equal to all contributors. With Musk spouting anti leftist propaganda daily. As owner of this carrier of Free Speech he should neutral and allow Free Speech to take its course. Instead he is manipulating the Right to such a degree that I would describe him as dangerous, bordering on media terrorism.
It's ironic that you accuse Musk of media manipulation when it’s actually the left that has mastered the art of controlling narratives through mainstream media, academia, and tech giants. The left claims to stand for free speech, but in reality, they’ve been silencing dissenting voices through censorship, cancel culture, and biased media coverage for years.
What’s truly dangerous is the way leftist ideology has been pushed so aggressively, with those who question it labelled as extremists or "terrorists." The true manipulation is coming from those who seek to control what we think, say, and believe—all while pretending to champion equality and fairness.
The right, on the other hand, is finally pushing back against this Orwellian control, demanding real free speech and transparency.
Those questioned are extremely dangerous. When one man can buy a platform for the sole purpose of controlling the minds of innocent people and manipulating that platform to be biased to one side which he is hoping might win so that he can move into a position of political and economic power so as to manipulate the economic markets is far from the Freedom of Speech he professes to encourage.
It seems you're attributing far too much power to one individual, as if Musk's acquisition of a platform is the sole factor shaping minds. The truth is, free speech inherently means allowing all viewpoints, even those we may disagree with. If the left dominates mainstream media, academia, and social platforms, should it not be balanced out by voices like Musk’s? What’s actually concerning is when dissenting views are silenced under the guise of “protecting” people, which happens far more on left-leaning platforms.
Musk isn’t manipulating people into one ideology—he’s simply opening the door for a more diverse range of opinions to be expressed, which is the very essence of free speech. The idea that one man’s actions could solely sway political and economic markets seems like an exaggeration. If anything, what we need is more open dialogue and less gatekeeping of ideas from either side.